Skip to main content
Consortium for Service Innovation

Phase 4: Maximizing

Phase 4: Maximizing

In Phase 4 we expand the scope of our measurement model even farther. Phase 4 focuses on:

  • Improving our ability to solve new issues (as the new vs known ratio shifts to more new)
  • Maturing the Evolve Loop processes
  • Optimizing the support network

Optimizing the Support Network

At this point on KCS journey we are thinking about support as a network of people and content. Our goal is to maximize the network for customer success. We want to connect people to content for known issues and people to people for new issues, with increasing speed and relevance over time. In order to optimize this network, we have to embrace a broader and more complicated set of metrics.

Phase 4 is a phase of tuning and continuous improvement as we look to optimize the network to better serve our customer needs, learn what we can from the activity in the network, and, at the same time, manage our support costs. As we discussed in the introduction, the opportunity is two-fold. On one hand, we want to minimize value erosion.  On the other hand, a network view of customer engagement gives us a more complete and timely perspective on the customer experience enabling us to identify opportunities to pursue value-add activities.

Customer Demand Model

To understand how to optimize the support network we have to understand all the customers’ activity in pursuing a resolution. A network view of support can be very enlightening. Data from the Consortium members indicates that less then 3% of the customer activity in pursuing a resolution is represented in the assisted model (opening a case or incident). 97% of the customer activity is in communities, social networks, and with self-service mechanisms.

Customer Demand Model

The first step is to understand the total customer demand for support and then understand the activity in each channel. To the extent we can, it is interesting to know how much of that activity is related to known issues vs new issues. Emerging patterns will often show up in communities and social channels before they show up in the assisted model. It is also helpful to understand the nature of the issues being pursued in each channel.  Is the channel being used the optimal one for that type of issue? Are there things we can do to get customers into the best channel based on the type of issue?

It's a Network

We want to continuously improve our ability to connect people with knowledge for known issues and connect people to people to collaborate on solving new issues. An important factor in optimizing this network is leveraging the emerging digital automation capabilities. The opportunities to apply digital automation, like auto-classification, pattern recognition, recommendation and prediction engines, and optimization models is based on having complete and accurate data.

In optimizing the network we reduce customer effort in finding resolutions to their issues.  We must also focus on reducing customer effort in implementing resolutions, and most importantly, quickly identify pervasive and high impact issues that are disrupting our customers’ success and productivity. This enables us to conduct root cause analysis and take corrective actions to remove the cause of those issues from the environment. This not only improves our customers’ experience but also attacks the cost drivers of support.

Vocabulary is Important

Focusing on support as a network is a customer engagement strategy. Sadly, the industry has adopted vocabulary that has no place in customer service and support. It is an unenlightened view of service and support that uses the words avoidance and deflection when talking about customer engagement and interaction. Cost avoidance is fine, as long as we are not optimizing our process at the expense of the customer, i.e. transferring cost or work from us to the customer. Our goal is cost savings in the context of reducing customer effort and optimizing our customers’ success and productivity in whatever channel the customer chooses to pursue a resolution.

The Ultimate Measurement Model

As we mentioned earlier a group of the Consortium members are actively working to develop a customer engagement measurement framework.  The team has identified the ultimate measurement model that would enable us to optimize the customer engagement network.  In order to do this, we need a very broad view of the customer activity: we have to understand the activity in each channel. Following is an example of the network measures based on customer demand.

The ultimate measures matrix.jpg

Understanding Flow

Another measurement model that can help us understand and improve customer success is a flow or journey model. There are a number of customer journeys we can map. Each organization will have to map the flow they have enabled for their customers. Below is a simple example of a customer journey. It is interesting to measure the success rate at each step along the journey: the rate at which customers move to the next step in the journey as well as the rate of abandoning the journey.

Demand Flow

Collecting the data for the customer activity, results, and experience in the support network is not trivial. However, Consortium member company PTC is collecting the data. They use a tool called Plotly to create the visualization for the demand flow. Here is an example of this kind of view.

PTC Flow

Focus areas and trends for Phase 4

Phase 4 Activities


Readiness Evidence

Increase customer loyalty Improve brand image and customer retention NPS
Lower customer effort 
  • Resolve issues
  • Optimize usage
  • Adopt features
Survey, CES

Work shifted from known to new

New opportunities and challenges for employees

New vs known—the work in the organization shifts from mostly known to mostly new, . Knowledge workers spend the majority of their time resolving new issues. This will vary based on product lifecycle or process/policy changes.

Time to adopt new/enhanced products

Customer success measured

Decrease from the baseline

Support cost as a percentage of revenue has decreased

Lower cost

Support costs have dropped by 2550%, and the volume of customer issues resolved is up at least 100% (web success combined with incidents closed)

Identification of pervasive issues   Increase speed 

Implications of “Mostly New”

One of the key goals of KCS is to solve an issue once and use it often. As we have mentioned, customer success with self-service and our influence with the owners and developers of our products, services, processes and policies should result in a shift in the ratio of new to known incidents. As the support organization’s work shifts to mostly new, inevitably the traditional tiered support model becomes ineffective. Solving a new issue is fundamentally a collaborative process and the old escalation model - moving incidents from level 1 to level 2 and so on - is ineffective for solving new issues. We need to rethink how we align people with work. The emerging collaboration model is called Intelligent Swarming. The measures for swarming are focused on assessing the health and effectiveness of collaboration. This is a new way to look at the organization and is an area of research and innovation currently underway for several Consortium member companies. For more information on Intelligent Swarming℠, please see the Consortium web site.

  • Was this article helpful?